
THE
PIONEERS OF MORGAN COUNTY
EARLY
TIMES AND EARLY SETTLERS
When
the
geographical lines were run and the descriptions given, it was found
that Morgan county contained about 450 square miles, or 288,000 acres,
which, if parceled out
equally, would have given 3,600 families an 80-acre farm each.
Statesmen ought to have known that homes rooted in
the ground of a republican form of government gave the best assurance of its permanent existence.
This they did not know, or knowing did not care, or caring could not
help; for, instead of discouraging land speculation, they have greatly promoted it from the start to
finish by Congressional enactment's.
In 1788,
Congress sold in the Northwest Territory six million acres of land to
speculators, for a price not exceeding 66 2/3 cents per acre. In the
case of John Cleves Symmes, the real cost was not more than 10 cents
per acre; while at the same time, Congress would not sell to an actual
settler less than 640 acres at $2 per acre. The above transactions consisted of one and
one half million acres to the "Ohio Company," three and one half
million acres to the "Scioto
Company," and one million acres to John Cleves Symmes. This sale was in the
State of Ohio and included
the ground on which Cincinnati now stands and was then nowhere surpassed in value as
wild land.
We have called attention to the above business
transaction of Congress to
show that from the beginning that august body has often been "sidetracked"
by the lender and seemed to
have forgotten the borrower of money. It is interesting to study the arguments of
the average Congressman for
the wholesale squandering of the public domain and playing it into the jaws of "land
sharks." They said: "Small
buyers are poor men, and poor men want credit. If we sell to them, in place of
revenue, we will, by such a
system, gain debtors. Men who can make cash payments must be rich, or, at least, 'well-to-do.'
For the 'well-to-do' a section
is none too large. For the rich a township (twenty three thousand and forty
acres) is none too much."
Poor men, it was argued, "cannot expect to buy of the government; they must have credit
and must go to the
speculator. Poor men, if allowed, will pick the best tracts here and there and will deprive the
speculator from locating his
land all together."
We cannot
pursue this line of argument without experiencing supreme contempt for the men who made it.
It was as yet but five years
since the close of the war for independence,
in which war, as is always the case, there were fifty poor men to one rich man, and
tens of thousands of them to
one millionaire. Poor men who marched and counter marched, weary and footsore, half
naked and half fed; men whose
wives and children were left under the providence of God to eke out a bare, hard
living; poor men who stood
like a stone wall between the rich in property and British confiscation, and between their
necks and a British halter.
The poor man was most certainly entitled to an opportunity to secure a little home in the
public domain he had helped
to win from the British crown.
But
Congress was slow to recognize his rights in the matter, and not until William Henry
Harrison was sent as a
delegate from the Northwest Territory to Congress was he placed on anything like an equal
footing with the "land- grabbers."
Mr. Harrison showed the injustice to the real settler by such enactment's and secured
such amendments to the law as
would enable the settler to purchase from the government one half section. The law was
finally so amended as to
allow the purchase of forty acres.
The love of speculation seems inherent in the
minds of men, and there has
been no greater field for its operation than land sales in new districts and in
and about towns and cities.
As the lands of a new country were first offered to the highest bidder at the land
office of a given district,
commonly called the land sales, there was often lively bidding. Here again the man of
small means was at a
disadvantage. After all his trouble and privation in building his cabin, clearing his ground,
and moving to his intended
new home, he might lose it on the day of sale for lack of a few dollars, for the speculator
was there in person or by
proxy, and did not scruple to turn down and out any "camper down" who stood in the way of
his plans.
Father James Parks, the well remembered
centenarian, so often seen in
Martinsville near the close of his life, related an instance that happened in Lawrence
county, where a "shark" named
Bullslit [Bulleit] attended the sales and, having plenty of money, over-reached a
whole settlement, bought all
the land and compelled the settlers to move on, which they did, Mr. Parks being among the
number. Coming to Monroe
county, they again began the arduous task of building other cabins and clearing
other grounds, which they
were more fortunate in retaining as permanent homes.
Fortunately, our county was never "exploited" by land speculators. It appears that from 80 to
160 acres was as much as most
men were able to buy at the start, though many men added several more acres to their
farms before they "went the
way of all the earth."
It appears that the Cutler Brothers once owned a
large tract of land at
Martinsville and north of it, running as far up the river as Co.'s High Rock Mills.
The first suit in the Morgan Circuit Court, 1822,
was Cutler vs. Cox, in
chancery. This probably grew out of a. land transaction. Whether they bought at
the land sales or of private
parties, or entered at government prices, is not known to the writer. They were men of
more than ordinary
enterprise. They bought at Martinsville the largest assortment of goods (value $1,000)
that appeared at any one time
before the year 1825. They donated forty acres of land for the county seat, and
were largely instrumental in
establishing it on the present site. They helped in the county organization and were among
the first county officers.
The first court was held in Jacob Cutler's house in Martinsville on the 25th day of March,
1822.
William Fair, himself a very early settler and who
was well acquainted with the
Cutlers, told the writer that they were about to get into serious trouble,
the nature of which he did
not reveal, and they quietly closed up their business affairs, disposed of all their lands and
moved away.
The next
owners of these lands were Sam Elliott and his son, Jacob Elliott, Lark Reynolds,
Thomas and James Clark,
Thomas Hendricks (father of the late Thompson Hendricks), and the two brothers, Joel and
William Wilson. In 1832 these
men owned the land between the town border north, and the south line of Sec.
16, T. 12, R. 1 E. The above
named Clarks must not be confounded with the name of John Clark, who bought the
Tommy Clark farm and moved to
it in 1836.
|